• EverythingApplePro tested the iPhone 2G, 3G, 3GS, 4, 4S, 5, 5C and 5S
  • All handsets were tested based on shut down and boot up times
  • The video shows the original model booted faster than the iPhone 4

By Victoria Woollaston

|

Apple has released a total of eight iPhone handsets since 2007 and each one has been released with the promise of faster speeds and improved performance.

But how different is the original model to the current 5S?

Fan site EverythingApplePro has created a video test of all eight handsets, from the original to the new model, plus the 3G, 3GS, 4, 4S, 5 and 5C.

Each of the handsets were 'freshly restored and not jailbroken' meaning they each had the same default settings and all applications were force closed beforehand. 

APPLE'S IOS 7 CAUSES 'MOTION SICKNESS AND NAUSEA'

Apple's new software has been slammed for causing users to feel sick.

Features on software including zooming screens and app windows, full-screen slide transitions, a 'faux-3D parallax effect' on the home screen.

As the phone is tilted, the icons appear to move independently from the wallpaper.

Stuff magazine investigated the effects these motion-based features had on users and discovered claims of nausea, motion sickness and even vertigo. 

In the first test, all the phones were powered off simultaneously and the 3GS shut down fastest, followed by 3G, then the 4, then the original model.

The newer handsets all took noticeably longer than the older models, but took exactly the same amount of time as each other, to the second.

The voiceover explained during the video that iOS 6 had a much faster shut down time than iOS 7 and this was highlighted in the test.

Each of the phones booted up at different times, but EverythingApplePro highlights that the models differ in the amount of processing power and RAM and software between the newest and oldest phones, meaning this was not unexpected.

The newer models all booted up first, and at almost the same time, yet the original phone booted up faster than the iPhone 4. Apple's iPhone 3G was the slowest to boost.

Fan site EverythingApplePro has created a video test of all eight handsets, from the original to the new 5S model, plus the 3G, 3GS, 4, 4S, 5 and 5C, pictured.

Fan site EverythingApplePro has created a video test of all eight handsets, from the original to the new 5S model, plus the 3G, 3GS, 4, 4S, 5 and 5C, pictured. Each of the handsets were 'freshly restored and not jailbroken' meaning they each had the same default settings and all applications were force closed

In the final tests, EverythingApplePro launched the Reddit.com, and Apple.com websites.

The male voiceover explained that the 5S loads sites 'instantaneously' adding: 'the extra processing power and the new Wi-Fi capabilities, its an amazing device'.

When launching Reddit.com, the iPhone 5 beat the 5 and the voiceover continued the loading times go 'downhill' from there.

In conclusion, the video maker claimed: 'I learnt that the amount of processing power is greater as the generation goes on, but it's marginally less noticeable the higher you go, so if you have a 5 I wouldn't really recommend upgrading to a 5S just based on the fact you want extra amount of power, because it has an amazing amount of power as it is.'

In the final tests, EverythingApplePro launched the Reddit.com, and Apple.com websites, pictured.

In the final tests, EverythingApplePro launched the Reddit.com, and Apple.com websites, pictured. During the video, the voiceover explained the 5S loads sites 'instantaneously'. When launching Reddit.com, the iPhone 5 beat the 5C but the rest of the handsets loaded the page slower than its successor

In a separate test, SquareTrade, a provider of protection plans for gadgets, compared five smartphones, including Apple's new iPhones, to see if they could withstand drops, dunks and other common hazards.

It found that while the iPhone 5C and 5S scored similar on the 'Breakability' scale, the latest models aren't as durable as last year's iPhone 5.

The biggest loser, however, was Samsung's Galaxy S4, which failed to work after being submerged in water and being dropped 5 feet off the ground, according to San Francisco-based SquareTrade.

The phone that withstood SquareTrade's torture test best was Google's Moto X.

New research by SquareTrade reveals that the iPhone 5s & 5c were outshone by their predecessor, the iPhone 5, and the Samsung Galaxy S4.

New research by SquareTrade reveals that the iPhone 5s & 5c were outshone by their predecessor, the iPhone 5, and the Samsung Galaxy S4.

 

The comments below have not been moderated.

yes get a samsung !

and err have u seen youtube videos comparing breakability and concludes the iphone is one of the most durable and well built phones

what an inaccurate ridiculous article, the DM once again hating on apple. just cause something boots faster doesn't mean it performs better. its like a ignorant author write this getting paid for junk.

I was wondering whether to upgrade my 4S to a 5S. I'm glad I did. The 5S loads apps in an instant and acquires a wifi connection in a fraction of the time of the 4S. The camera starts up around thee times faster than the 4S. Who cares how long it takes to boot up once a month?

the original model booted faster than the iPhone 4 ------------ OF COURSE it would. It has far less to load than later models.

Yep! The original iPhone OS didn't even support custom apps.

Hardly a difinitve test considering that rebooting is the thing done most rarely on the iPhone - any type. For speed of use and usability my 4s rates way above my old 3s. My partner's 5 is better again. He owns every model from the original to the 5 and the difference is quite notable with the newer design and operating systems being a marked improvement, especially with regard to screen quality etc. my old Nokia 6330 which is my work phone also takes a bloody age to start up, but that's hardly worth an article!

Upgrade? should have called it down grade.

Please DM! Don't upset the little boys and their toys..

Keep paying for your iphone upgrades you sheep... Bah!

For the record I do not have an iPhone, but just thought I should point out to you that Android outsold iPhone so are they sheep too? I guess everyone who owns a phone are by your standards.

Sort it out you Predictive Gee-Gee Upgraders:) I'm sticking with my Nokia 3310.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.