• Which? tested speeds of phones made by Apple, Samsung, HTC and LG
  • Apple's iPhone 5S came out on top while the HTC One Mini took last place
  • Samsung's Galaxy S4 dropped from first to third behind the LG G2
  • iPhone 5S was twice as fast as Samsung's Galaxy S4 in certain tests
  • Apple's new high-end handset was around 50 per cent faster overall

By Victoria Woollaston

|

In the ongoing battle of the handsets, Apple has taken another swipe at Samsung by being named 'the fastest phone ever' by Which? magazine.

Researchers independently tested the processing speeds and performance of the latest phones from Apple, Samsung, HTC and LG. Processing speed determines how quickly the phones can open apps, play videos and games, multitask and more.

Apple's iPhone 5S came top of list, ahead of LG's G2 in second. Samsung's Galaxy S4 came third.

London-based Which? magazine tested the speeds of the latest Apple, Samsung, HTC and LG phones.

Which? magazine tested the speeds of the latest Apple, Samsung, HTC and LG phones to see which offered the best performance. The iPhone 5S was found to be the fastest of the lot, pictured centre. LG's G2 handset, left, came second and Samsung's Galaxy S4, right, was third

HTC's One handset was fourth, ahead of the iPhone 5C. The Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini was fifth,
while HTC's One Mini scored the lowest.

Which? said: 'In June of this year we found the iPhone 5 had been eclipsed and that the Samsung Galaxy S4 had seized the number one spot for processor speed. In fact the iPhone 5 languished back in 7th place.

'But Apple is back. New Which? lab tests have revealed that the recently released iPhone 5S has broken all records in our processor benchmarking tests.'

The interesting point to note with these results is that Apple's iPhone 5S has a dual-core 1.3Ghz processor. Its main rivals, including the S4, feature quad-core processors.

Quad-core processors are believed to be faster, yet having more cores doesn't necessarily increase speed. It instead increases the phone's ability to do more things at once, faster, which is a small but significant distinction.

HOW DID THE OTHER PHONES STACK UP?

The Which? results come from benchmarking tests using Geekbench software.

Geekbench is designed to 'replicate real-world tasks' and calculates both single core and multi-core performance, to give an indication to the phone's overall speeds.

The first score is the single core score, while the second is the multi-core score.

Which infographic

Apple iPhone 5s: 1410 (single), 2561 (multi)

LG G2: 882 (single), 2355 (multi)

Samsung Galaxy S4: 687 (single), 1939 (multi)

HTC One: 643 (single), 1805 (multi)

Apple iPhone 5C: 711 (single), 1281 (multi)

Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini: 649 (single), 1135 (multi)

HTC One Mini: 477 (single), 880 (multi)

This shows that in single core tests, Apple's iPhone 5S offers more than double the performance of the S4. In multi-core tests it scored 622 more points.

'As our tests show, more cores do not necessarily mean better performance,' explains Which? in a blog post.

The Which? results come from benchmarking tests using Geekbench software.

Geekbench is designed to 'replicate real-world tasks' and calculates both single core and multi-core performance, that gives an indication to the phone's speeds.

Each phone was run through a series of performance tests, with each test and result being given a score. These scores were then combined and weighted before being calculated into a final numeric score.

Which? measured these scores against a Mac mini computer with an Intel Core i5 processor, to get a baseline score of 2,500 points.

Which? tested the phones against a benchmark score of 2,500 points. The higher a phone's score, the better its performance. Apple's iPhone 5S, left, scored 1410 on single core tests while Samsung's Galaxy S4, right, scored 687. In multi-core tests, Apple scored 2561 and Samsung scored 1939

The higher a phone's score, the better and faster it is and if a score is double, for example, the phone offers double the performance.

'These benchmarks are useful as they let us compare phones against one another but they aren't the be all and end all,' explained Which? technology researcher Jon Barrow.

'In truth most of the top phones feel fantastically smooth in everyday use. The iPhone 5s will feel a little snappier when swiping through menus and opening apps - and that fraction of a second when you launch a programme is not to be underestimated when you consider how often we use our phones.

'But premium handsets, like the Samsung Galaxy S4 and HTC One, also feel lighting fast.'

He continued that the iPhone 5S is 'built for the future' and the extra speed is most noticeable when using 'power-hungry apps and editing videos.'

 

The comments below have not been moderated.

Another free Apple advert

I really dont understand why magazines or tech websites do these stupid tests, you are supposed to test the current flagships of each device, apple's flagship is the iphone 5, samsungs current flagship is the galaxy note 3, htc's current flagship is the htc one max. Which must be stupid or must not have much technical knowledge, the iphone 5s screen is way smaller than the s4 or any latest phone out atm, most latest phones have 5 inch screens compared to iphone 5s 4inch, also the latest flagships have 1080p(1920*1080) resolution screens, the iphone 5s screen is not even proper 720p(1280*720) its 1136*640. So in conclusion, this isnt a fair test in anyway whatsoever, the iphone does not need to work as hard as the other flagships because when it comes to specs its not as good.

The newest phone beats the older phone... weird. lol I love the way the newest and fastest phone the Samsung Note 3 wasn't included in this super unbiased test...

I am not an Apple fan, but I admired Steve Jobs. He had a way of convincing people that they needed to buy the devices that he produced. Steve rarely spoke of specifications, and if he did they were an aside to the differences that his devices would make to people's lives. Apple really have lost their way.

made in China, South Korea and Taiwan.

Totally biased, they test the latest i Phone against an older HTC. Where was the HTC X One +. Obviously the writer of this is an I-tard.

I don't get the DM sometimes. Most if the time their stories are bashing Apple, next minuet they're saying how great they are.

Since when is speed the only factor? Open source, decent screen size, automation, personalisation are equally important factors!

So what do Apple users do with the extra mini seconds they gain......send another text ?. Whoopppeee...

Why does the DM constantly exclude Sony phones? The new Z1 is faster and more accomplished. Who pays for these ads?

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.